205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.78%
Revenue growth 50-75% of QCOM's 10.80%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
8.10%
Cost growth 1.1-1.25x QCOM's 6.73%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of cost control initiatives.
1.19%
Gross profit growth below 50% of QCOM's 14.56%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.33%
Margin decline while QCOM shows 3.39% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
2.79%
R&D growth less than half of QCOM's 20.34%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.06%
Operating expenses reduction while QCOM shows 18.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
5.40%
Total costs growth less than half of QCOM's 12.40%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
70.00%
D&A growth above 1.5x QCOM's 5.41%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
12.53%
EBITDA growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.39%
EBITDA margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.44%
Operating income growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.52%
Operating margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-185.71%
Other expenses reduction while QCOM shows 67.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
5.12%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of QCOM's 14.08%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.62%
Pre-tax margin decline while QCOM shows 2.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
7.58%
Tax expense growth while QCOM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.96%
Net income growth below 50% of QCOM's 21.67%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.72%
Net margin decline while QCOM shows 9.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
5.56%
EPS change of 5.56% while QCOM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
5.56%
Diluted EPS change of 5.56% while QCOM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
0.59%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 21.67%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.84%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 21.67%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.