205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.20%
Revenue growth below 50% of QCOM's 22.11%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
10.72%
Cost growth less than half of QCOM's 30.22%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-6.44%
Gross profit decline while QCOM shows 15.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-11.06%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-100.00%
R&D reduction while QCOM shows 11.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.46%
Operating expenses reduction while QCOM shows 4.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
6.89%
Total costs growth less than half of QCOM's 17.07%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-416.67%
D&A reduction while QCOM shows 20.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-12.30%
EBITDA decline while QCOM shows 64.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.63%
EBITDA margin decline while QCOM shows 17.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.41%
Operating income decline while QCOM shows 164.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.03%
Operating margin decline while QCOM shows 116.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
450.00%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x QCOM's 82.98%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-0.23%
Pre-tax income decline while QCOM shows 117.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.16%
Pre-tax margin decline while QCOM shows 77.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.11%
Tax expense reduction while QCOM shows 737.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.69%
Net income growth below 50% of QCOM's 49.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.28%
Net margin decline while QCOM shows 22.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.26%
EPS decline while QCOM shows 8.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.26%
Diluted EPS decline while QCOM shows 8.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.57%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 38.36%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-0.27%
Diluted share reduction while QCOM shows 38.36% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.