205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.33%
Revenue growth below 50% of QCOM's 57.33%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
1.22%
Cost growth less than half of QCOM's 70.34%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-1.92%
Gross profit decline while QCOM shows 40.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-2.25%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
90.64%
R&D growth above 1.5x QCOM's 32.29%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.03%
Similar operating expenses growth to QCOM's 31.45%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
9.54%
Total costs growth less than half of QCOM's 52.47%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-87.50%
D&A reduction while QCOM shows 25.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-542.50%
EBITDA decline while QCOM shows 48.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-541.03%
EBITDA margin decline while QCOM shows 251.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-231.58%
Operating income decline while QCOM shows 32.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-231.14%
Operating margin decline while QCOM shows 57.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-166.67%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-244.57%
Pre-tax income decline while QCOM shows 1700.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-244.08%
Pre-tax margin decline while QCOM shows 1044.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.25%
Tax expense reduction while QCOM shows 121.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-293.42%
Net income decline while QCOM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-292.78%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-274.42%
EPS decline while QCOM shows 7.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-274.42%
Diluted EPS decline while QCOM shows 7.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.10%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 14.85%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-2.51%
Diluted share reduction while QCOM shows 14.85% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.