205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-51.02%
Revenue decline while QCOM shows 20.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-52.73%
Cost reduction while QCOM shows 20.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-46.54%
Gross profit decline while QCOM shows 19.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
9.15%
Margin expansion while QCOM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-55.80%
R&D reduction while QCOM shows 3.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.72%
Operating expenses reduction while QCOM shows 8.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-46.87%
Total costs reduction while QCOM shows 16.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
120.00%
D&A growth above 1.5x QCOM's 11.76%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-7.91%
EBITDA decline while QCOM shows 283.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-120.30%
EBITDA margin decline while QCOM shows 111.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-55.20%
Operating income decline while QCOM shows 170.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-216.85%
Operating margin decline while QCOM shows 158.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-250.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-66.92%
Pre-tax income decline while QCOM shows 488.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-240.77%
Pre-tax margin decline while QCOM shows 388.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-666.67%
Tax expense reduction while QCOM shows 800.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
80.95%
Net income growth below 50% of QCOM's 426.67%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
61.11%
Net margin growth below 50% of QCOM's 336.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
81.13%
EPS growth below 50% of QCOM's 400.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
81.13%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of QCOM's 400.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.19%
Share count increase while QCOM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.19%
Diluted share increase while QCOM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.