205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.31%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-4.95%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
2.08%
Gross profit growth below 50% of QCOM's 26.26%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.49%
Margin expansion below 50% of QCOM's 42.15%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.79%
R&D reduction while QCOM shows 22.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.56%
Operating expenses reduction while QCOM shows 14.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-5.72%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
60.24%
D&A growth above 1.5x QCOM's 6.80%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
59.31%
EBITDA growth 1.25-1.5x QCOM's 49.88%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
63.07%
Similar EBITDA margin growth to QCOM's 71.19%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
24.74%
Operating income growth below 50% of QCOM's 112.73%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
27.68%
Operating margin growth below 50% of QCOM's 139.50%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-82.46%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
6.98%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of QCOM's 60.48%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.50%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of QCOM's 80.68%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.50%
Tax expense growth while QCOM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
587.55%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 114.66%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
603.78%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 141.68%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
558.82%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 133.33%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
568.75%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 100.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.89%
Share count increase while QCOM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.76%
Diluted share increase while QCOM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.