205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-9.93%
Revenue decline while QCOM shows 30.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
2.50%
Cost growth less than half of QCOM's 31.76%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-29.32%
Gross profit decline while QCOM shows 28.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-21.54%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-55.74%
R&D reduction while QCOM shows 4.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-39.72%
Operating expenses reduction while QCOM shows 23.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-15.94%
Total costs reduction while QCOM shows 29.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.31%
Similar D&A growth to QCOM's 11.78%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
70.19%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 31.99%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
66.90%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 7.31%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
89.00%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 47.61%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
87.79%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 12.97%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-11.36%
Other expenses reduction while QCOM shows 61.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
110.90%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 48.41%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
112.10%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 13.58%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-94.39%
Tax expense reduction while QCOM shows 147.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
103.86%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 22.06%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
104.28%
Net margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
105.56%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 37.80%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
105.56%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 18.11%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.07%
Share count increase while QCOM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.33%
Diluted share increase while QCOM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.