205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
17.46%
Positive growth while QCOM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
8.43%
Cost increase while QCOM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
25.99%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 3.28%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
7.26%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 4.25%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
17.36%
R&D growth above 1.5x QCOM's 2.34%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.50%
Other expenses change of 12.50% while QCOM maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
10.59%
Operating expenses growth less than half of QCOM's 37.37%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
8.85%
Total costs growth 1.1-1.25x QCOM's 7.41%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.67%
D&A growth while QCOM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
89.76%
EBITDA growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
61.55%
Similar EBITDA margin growth to QCOM's 72.16%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
54.85%
Operating income growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
31.83%
Operating margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-31.43%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
42.74%
Pre-tax income growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.52%
Pre-tax margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
60.91%
Tax expense growth while QCOM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
29.41%
Net income growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.18%
Net margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
31.25%
EPS growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
25.00%
Diluted EPS growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.26%
Share count increase while QCOM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.57%
Diluted share increase while QCOM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.