205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.42%
Revenue decline while QCOM shows 7.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
6.96%
Cost increase while QCOM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-0.96%
Gross profit decline while QCOM shows 31.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.54%
Margin decline while QCOM shows 22.28% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-4.11%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
188.89%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x QCOM's 14.11%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
5.35%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x QCOM's 1.51%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
6.37%
Total costs growth while QCOM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-135.38%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-27.25%
EBITDA decline while QCOM shows 50.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-26.94%
EBITDA margin decline while QCOM shows 15.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.38%
Operating income decline while QCOM shows 1795.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.97%
Operating margin decline while QCOM shows 1660.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
187.50%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x QCOM's 89.13%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
14.68%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of QCOM's 238.31%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
15.16%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of QCOM's 228.44%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.21%
Tax expense growth less than half of QCOM's 238.32%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
21.82%
Net income growth below 50% of QCOM's 238.31%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
22.33%
Net margin growth below 50% of QCOM's 228.44%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.29%
EPS growth below 50% of QCOM's 225.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
15.00%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of QCOM's 212.50%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.86%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 12.84%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
5.55%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 41.07%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.