205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
13.12%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 5.53%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
5.28%
Cost growth 1.25-1.5x QCOM's 3.94%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive cost position.
16.17%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 7.87%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2.69%
Margin expansion 1.25-1.5x QCOM's 2.21%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-3.71%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
8.96%
Operating expenses growth while QCOM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.62%
Total costs growth while QCOM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.68%
D&A growth while QCOM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
42.76%
EBITDA growth 50-75% of QCOM's 84.36%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
26.19%
EBITDA margin growth 1.25-1.5x QCOM's 18.17%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
12.17%
Operating income growth below 50% of QCOM's 127.31%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.84%
Operating margin decline while QCOM shows 115.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-39.86%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
0.68%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of QCOM's 131.54%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-11.00%
Pre-tax margin decline while QCOM shows 119.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-28.72%
Tax expense reduction while QCOM shows 133.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
13.43%
Net income growth below 50% of QCOM's 130.75%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.27%
Net margin growth below 50% of QCOM's 118.65%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.33%
EPS growth below 50% of QCOM's 72.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.70%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of QCOM's 91.11%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.53%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 31.55%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
1.38%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 5.23%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.