205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.97%
Positive growth while QCOM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.65%
Cost increase while QCOM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
4.03%
Positive growth while QCOM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.03%
Margin expansion below 50% of QCOM's 23.22%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.25%
R&D reduction while QCOM shows 8.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
150.00%
Other expenses growth 1.1-1.25x QCOM's 121.68%. Bill Ackman would demand expense justification.
1.78%
Operating expenses growth less than half of QCOM's 16.14%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
3.62%
Total costs growth while QCOM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-981.45%
D&A reduction while QCOM shows 32.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-280.40%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-275.20%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
12.45%
Operating income growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.21%
Operating margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1139.25%
Similar other expenses growth to QCOM's 1352.69%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
198.18%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 41.29%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
189.58%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 117.46%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
217.06%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x QCOM's 89.26%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
207.84%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 12.76%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
198.96%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 73.55%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
204.00%
EPS change of 204.00% while QCOM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
200.00%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 8.33%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
4.94%
Share count reduction below 50% of QCOM's 7.86%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
5.32%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of QCOM's 1.34%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.