205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
11.15%
Positive growth while QCOM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
10.63%
Cost increase while QCOM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
8.67%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of QCOM's 16.22%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
-2.23%
Margin decline while QCOM shows 18.54% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
33.25%
R&D growth while QCOM reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while QCOM shows 9.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
23.10%
Operating expenses growth while QCOM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.69%
Total costs growth while QCOM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
57.87%
D&A growth 50-75% of QCOM's 78.52%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset strategy.
95.13%
EBITDA growth 1.25-1.5x QCOM's 68.48%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
95.61%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of QCOM's 537.94%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-14.93%
Operating income decline while QCOM shows 202.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-23.46%
Operating margin decline while QCOM shows 208.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-58.67%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-45.31%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-50.79%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-40.36%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-47.61%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-52.86%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-48.68%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-47.22%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.47%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 3.48%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-4.07%
Diluted share reduction while QCOM shows 0.51% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.