205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-19.42%
Revenue decline while QCOM shows 4.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
1.20%
Cost increase while QCOM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-49.76%
Gross profit decline while QCOM shows 18.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-37.64%
Margin decline while QCOM shows 13.61% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-7.62%
R&D reduction while QCOM shows 23.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.27%
Operating expenses growth while QCOM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.57%
Total costs growth while QCOM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.42%
D&A growth while QCOM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-76.74%
EBITDA decline while QCOM shows 184.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-71.13%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-230.13%
Operating income decline while QCOM shows 153.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-261.50%
Operating margin decline while QCOM shows 151.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-53.85%
Other expenses reduction while QCOM shows 130.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-180.00%
Pre-tax income decline while QCOM shows 144.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-199.28%
Pre-tax margin decline while QCOM shows 143.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-165.56%
Tax expense reduction while QCOM shows 148.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-185.65%
Net income decline while QCOM shows 165.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-206.30%
Net margin decline while QCOM shows 162.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-184.62%
EPS decline while QCOM shows 150.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-184.62%
Diluted EPS decline while QCOM shows 146.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.23%
Share count reduction below 50% of QCOM's 0.69%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
1.23%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 7.65%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.