PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
3.98%
Revenue growth below 50% of QCOM's 10.75%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
8.19%
Cost increase while QCOM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-2.45%
Gross profit decline while QCOM shows 19.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-6.19%
Margin decline while QCOM shows 7.85% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
2.72%
R&D growth above 1.5x QCOM's 1.14%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.57%
Operating expenses growth less than half of QCOM's 13.06%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
6.58%
Similar total costs growth to QCOM's 6.04%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.24%
D&A growth less than half of QCOM's 8.12%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-7.84%
EBITDA decline while QCOM shows 38.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.37%
EBITDA margin decline while QCOM shows 77.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-29.68%
Operating income decline while QCOM shows 38.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-32.37%
Operating margin decline while QCOM shows 25.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
213.16%
Other expenses growth while QCOM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
29.91%
Pre-tax income growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
24.94%
Pre-tax margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-263.64%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
97.89%
Net income growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
90.32%
Net margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
120.00%
EPS growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
120.00%
Diluted EPS growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-10.05%
Share count reduction while QCOM shows 0.68% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-10.05%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.