205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.54%
Revenue decline while QCOM shows 13.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-2.55%
Cost reduction while QCOM shows 8.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-7.90%
Gross profit decline while QCOM shows 16.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-3.53%
Margin decline while QCOM shows 2.66% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.72%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.31%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-2.81%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.19%
D&A growth less than half of QCOM's 4.30%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-6.99%
EBITDA decline while QCOM shows 161.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.57%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-38.53%
Operating income decline while QCOM shows 82.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-35.61%
Operating margin decline while QCOM shows 60.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1574.42%
Other expenses reduction while QCOM shows 87.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-473.03%
Pre-tax income decline while QCOM shows 523.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-490.76%
Pre-tax margin decline while QCOM shows 473.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
161.11%
Similar tax expense growth to QCOM's 196.08%. Walter Schloss would investigate patterns.
-413.30%
Net income decline while QCOM shows 1482.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-428.19%
Net margin decline while QCOM shows 1319.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-427.27%
EPS decline while QCOM shows 1448.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-427.27%
Diluted EPS decline while QCOM shows 1448.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.63%
Share count reduction while QCOM shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-4.63%
Diluted share reduction while QCOM shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.