205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
9.36%
Positive growth while QCOM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.86%
Cost growth above 1.5x QCOM's 1.93%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
15.92%
Positive growth while QCOM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
6.00%
Margin expansion while QCOM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-4.27%
R&D reduction while QCOM shows 5.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.20%
Operating expenses reduction while QCOM shows 7.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
2.10%
Total costs growth less than half of QCOM's 4.58%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.36%
D&A growth less than half of QCOM's 9.48%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
31.38%
EBITDA growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
20.14%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of QCOM's 71.01%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
75.90%
Operating income growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
60.85%
Operating margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-8.89%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
46.09%
Pre-tax income growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
33.59%
Pre-tax margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
176.19%
Tax expense growth while QCOM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.77%
Net income growth below 50% of QCOM's 52.02%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.95%
Net margin growth below 50% of QCOM's 54.16%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-15.38%
EPS decline while QCOM shows 50.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.00%
Diluted EPS decline while QCOM shows 50.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
50.74%
Share count change of 50.74% while QCOM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
51.98%
Diluted share increase while QCOM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.