205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.99%
Revenue growth below 50% of QCOM's 36.67%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
2.41%
Cost growth less than half of QCOM's 22.60%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
10.72%
Gross profit growth below 50% of QCOM's 44.82%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.46%
Margin expansion 50-75% of QCOM's 5.96%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
10.27%
R&D growth above 1.5x QCOM's 4.63%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.17%
Similar operating expenses growth to QCOM's 15.73%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
5.57%
Total costs growth less than half of QCOM's 19.47%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.14%
D&A reduction while QCOM shows 3.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
1.45%
EBITDA growth below 50% of QCOM's 77.38%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.29%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
8.22%
Operating income growth below 50% of QCOM's 72.25%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.10%
Operating margin growth below 50% of QCOM's 26.03%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-65.85%
Other expenses reduction while QCOM shows 104.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-8.02%
Pre-tax income decline while QCOM shows 73.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.22%
Pre-tax margin decline while QCOM shows 27.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
210.42%
Tax expense growth less than half of QCOM's 879.08%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-28.46%
Net income decline while QCOM shows 20.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-32.50%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.55%
EPS decline while QCOM shows 22.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.13%
Share count reduction while QCOM shows 1.26% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-34.35%
Diluted share reduction while QCOM shows 4.62% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.