205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.28%
Revenue growth below 50% of QCOM's 10.27%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
0.06%
Cost growth less than half of QCOM's 10.16%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
0.54%
Gross profit growth below 50% of QCOM's 10.31%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.26%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 0.04%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-6.03%
R&D reduction while QCOM shows 14.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.41%
Operating expenses reduction while QCOM shows 14.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.11%
Total costs reduction while QCOM shows 12.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.14%
D&A growth less than half of QCOM's 27.15%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
7.91%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 0.79%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
7.61%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 0.63%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
10.98%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x QCOM's 7.86%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
10.67%
Operating margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
93.33%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x QCOM's 37.91%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
14.95%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 9.51%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
14.63%
Pre-tax margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-16.02%
Tax expense reduction while QCOM shows 7.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
27.66%
Net income growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
27.31%
Net margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
32.00%
EPS change of 32.00% while QCOM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
28.00%
Diluted EPS change of 28.00% while QCOM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-1.93%
Share count reduction while QCOM shows 0.54% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.28%
Diluted share reduction while QCOM shows 0.61% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.