205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-5.74%
Revenue decline while QCOM shows 24.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-10.06%
Cost reduction while QCOM shows 4.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
0.15%
Gross profit growth below 50% of QCOM's 35.73%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.25%
Margin expansion 50-75% of QCOM's 9.09%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
1.43%
R&D growth less than half of QCOM's 9.92%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.29%
Operating expenses reduction while QCOM shows 8.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.27%
Total costs reduction while QCOM shows 6.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.84%
D&A reduction while QCOM shows 5.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-0.90%
EBITDA decline while QCOM shows 44.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
5.14%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of QCOM's 28.38%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.69%
Operating income growth below 50% of QCOM's 61.25%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.94%
Operating margin growth below 50% of QCOM's 29.61%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-45.24%
Other expenses reduction while QCOM shows 73.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.40%
Pre-tax income decline while QCOM shows 63.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.42%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of QCOM's 31.13%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
69.23%
Tax expense growth less than half of QCOM's 326.60%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-16.12%
Net income decline while QCOM shows 30.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.01%
Net margin decline while QCOM shows 4.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.24%
EPS decline while QCOM shows 29.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.29%
Diluted EPS decline while QCOM shows 25.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.33%
Share count reduction while QCOM shows 1.06% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.36%
Diluted share reduction while QCOM shows 5.07% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.