PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.06%
Revenue growth below 50% of QCOM's 14.95%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
2.09%
Cost growth less than half of QCOM's 13.37%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-2.03%
Gross profit decline while QCOM shows 15.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-2.09%
Margin decline while QCOM shows 0.55% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-5.12%
R&D reduction while QCOM shows 4.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while QCOM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-3.24%
Operating expenses reduction while QCOM shows 10.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.25%
Total costs growth less than half of QCOM's 11.65%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.38%
D&A growth above 1.5x QCOM's 9.80%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
13.71%
EBITDA growth below 50% of QCOM's 29.64%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
13.64%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 8.03%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
6.44%
Operating income growth below 50% of QCOM's 19.64%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.38%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 4.08%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
6.38%
Other expenses growth while QCOM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.44%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of QCOM's 14.58%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.38%
Pre-tax margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.30%
Tax expense reduction while QCOM shows 96.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
3.80%
Net income growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.75%
Net margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.13%
EPS growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.26%
Diluted EPS growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.23%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-1.50%
Diluted share reduction while QCOM shows 0.18% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.