205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.18%
Revenue decline while QCOM shows 11.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-10.50%
Cost reduction while QCOM shows 17.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-3.63%
Gross profit decline while QCOM shows 9.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
3.83%
Margin expansion while QCOM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
6.60%
R&D growth less than half of QCOM's 25.46%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.14%
Operating expenses growth less than half of QCOM's 28.67%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-5.97%
Total costs reduction while QCOM shows 23.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.71%
D&A reduction while QCOM shows 3.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-20.09%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.91%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.36%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.50%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.00%
Other expenses reduction while QCOM shows 116.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-10.81%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.91%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
9.76%
Tax expense growth while QCOM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-10.69%
Net income decline while QCOM shows 15.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.78%
Net margin decline while QCOM shows 3.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.76%
EPS decline while QCOM shows 18.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.00%
Diluted EPS decline while QCOM shows 12.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.18%
Share count reduction while QCOM shows 0.80% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.22%
Diluted share reduction while QCOM shows 0.95% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.