205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.85%
Revenue decline while QCOM shows 1.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-9.39%
Cost reduction while QCOM shows 8.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-6.35%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.63%
Margin expansion while QCOM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.72%
R&D reduction while QCOM shows 6.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.55%
Operating expenses reduction while QCOM shows 10.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-6.90%
Total costs reduction while QCOM shows 9.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.39%
D&A growth less than half of QCOM's 10.98%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-7.79%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.07%
EBITDA margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-11.23%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.66%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-44.29%
Other expenses reduction while QCOM shows 57.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-14.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.66%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
22.29%
Tax expense growth while QCOM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-22.75%
Net income decline while QCOM shows 5.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.17%
Net margin decline while QCOM shows 4.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.74%
EPS decline while QCOM shows 8.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-23.91%
Diluted EPS decline while QCOM shows 5.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.77%
Share count reduction while QCOM shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-2.00%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.