205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.99%
Revenue decline while QCOM shows 5.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-6.94%
Cost reduction while QCOM shows 8.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-8.87%
Gross profit decline while QCOM shows 4.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.96%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.98%
R&D growth less than half of QCOM's 6.24%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.93%
Operating expenses growth less than half of QCOM's 11.94%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-3.71%
Total costs reduction while QCOM shows 10.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.80%
D&A growth above 1.5x QCOM's 8.00%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-10.72%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.97%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.98%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.94%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-28.26%
Other expenses reduction while QCOM shows 1.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-19.39%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.39%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-38.41%
Tax expense reduction while QCOM shows 188.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-12.32%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.71%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.09%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.26%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.28%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-3.79%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.