205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.41%
Revenue growth below 50% of QCOM's 6.80%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
5.67%
Cost growth 1.1-1.25x QCOM's 4.73%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of cost control initiatives.
-0.40%
Gross profit decline while QCOM shows 7.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-2.75%
Margin decline while QCOM shows 0.92% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-5.06%
R&D reduction while QCOM shows 8.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.48%
Operating expenses reduction while QCOM shows 8.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
2.15%
Total costs growth less than half of QCOM's 6.54%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.59%
D&A growth 50-75% of QCOM's 2.78%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset strategy.
2.84%
EBITDA growth below 50% of QCOM's 7.40%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.41%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of QCOM's 5.59%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.22%
Operating income growth below 50% of QCOM's 7.40%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.79%
Operating margin growth 1.25-1.5x QCOM's 0.56%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-48.48%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
1.19%
Pre-tax income growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.20%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
47.19%
Tax expense growth while QCOM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-11.18%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.27%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.00%
EPS decline while QCOM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.20%
Diluted EPS decline while QCOM shows 2.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.53%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.52%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.