205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.07%
Revenue growth below 50% of QCOM's 5.99%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
8.86%
Similar cost growth to QCOM's 8.41%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
-6.06%
Gross profit decline while QCOM shows 4.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-7.06%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.89%
R&D growth 50-75% of QCOM's 7.78%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.07%
Operating expenses reduction while QCOM shows 7.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
4.88%
Total costs growth 50-75% of QCOM's 8.09%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.96%
D&A growth less than half of QCOM's 5.41%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-7.54%
EBITDA decline while QCOM shows 23.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.52%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.44%
Operating income decline while QCOM shows 1.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.40%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-41.18%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-11.06%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-26.34%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-4.25%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.27%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.44%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.27%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.21%
Share count reduction while QCOM shows 0.56% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.72%
Diluted share reduction while QCOM shows 2.29% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.