205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-26.45%
Revenue decline while QCOM shows 20.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-20.07%
Cost reduction while QCOM shows 3.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-33.23%
Gross profit decline while QCOM shows 28.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-9.22%
Margin decline while QCOM shows 6.73% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-14.99%
R&D reduction while QCOM shows 4.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.72%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x QCOM's 2.67%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-7.57%
Total costs reduction while QCOM shows 3.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.69%
D&A growth above 1.5x QCOM's 2.56%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-61.53%
EBITDA decline while QCOM shows 45.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-47.69%
EBITDA margin decline while QCOM shows 50.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-93.30%
Operating income decline while QCOM shows 62.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-90.89%
Operating margin decline while QCOM shows 34.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-240.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-95.24%
Pre-tax income decline while QCOM shows 25.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-93.53%
Pre-tax margin decline while QCOM shows 4.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-136.79%
Tax expense reduction while QCOM shows 71.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-80.99%
Net income decline while QCOM shows 17.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-74.16%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-79.07%
EPS decline while QCOM shows 13.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-79.07%
Diluted EPS decline while QCOM shows 15.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.76%
Share count reduction while QCOM shows 1.48% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-2.28%
Diluted share reduction while QCOM shows 1.45% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.