205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
9.08%
Positive growth while QCOM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
5.67%
Cost increase while QCOM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
12.14%
Growth of 12.14% while QCOM shows flat gross profit. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
2.80%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 0.26%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
5.95%
R&D growth 50-75% of QCOM's 8.72%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
70.00%
Other expenses change of 70.00% while QCOM maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
6.50%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of QCOM's 10.56%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
5.94%
Total costs growth 1.1-1.25x QCOM's 5.36%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.79%
D&A growth 50-75% of QCOM's 3.09%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset strategy.
13.01%
EBITDA growth below 50% of QCOM's 31.22%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.60%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of QCOM's 23.83%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
16.53%
Operating income growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.83%
Operating margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-42.86%
Other expenses reduction while QCOM shows 9.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
16.09%
Pre-tax income growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.43%
Pre-tax margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.38%
Tax expense growth while QCOM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
16.87%
Net income growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.14%
Net margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
18.87%
EPS growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
19.23%
Diluted EPS growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.03%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-2.01%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.