PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.98%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 1.61%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
6.18%
Cost growth 50-75% of QCOM's 11.87%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
7.66%
Positive growth while QCOM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.63%
Margin expansion while QCOM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
6.38%
R&D growth above 1.5x QCOM's 0.15%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-76.47%
Other expenses reduction while QCOM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
3.18%
Operating expenses growth while QCOM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.19%
Total costs growth above 1.5x QCOM's 1.43%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.75%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
9.04%
EBITDA growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.93%
EBITDA margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.84%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 2.06%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
3.61%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 0.44%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
100.00%
Other expenses growth while QCOM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.16%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 0.62%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
3.91%
Pre-tax margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.94%
Tax expense growth 1.25-1.5x QCOM's 6.81%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize strategy.
11.70%
Net income growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.42%
Net margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
12.70%
EPS change of 12.70% while QCOM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
14.52%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 2.17%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-1.99%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-2.05%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.