205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-5.75%
Revenue decline while QCOM shows 9.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-2.70%
Cost reduction while QCOM shows 9.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-8.29%
Gross profit decline while QCOM shows 9.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-2.69%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.00%
R&D reduction while QCOM shows 1.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3650.00%
Other expenses reduction while QCOM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-21.18%
Operating expenses reduction while QCOM shows 11.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-8.67%
Total costs reduction while QCOM shows 10.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.25%
D&A growth above 1.5x QCOM's 3.01%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
0.55%
EBITDA growth below 50% of QCOM's 103.10%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.68%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of QCOM's 69.13%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.24%
Operating income growth below 50% of QCOM's 5.56%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.36%
Operating margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
125.00%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x QCOM's 17.32%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
1.05%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of QCOM's 7.72%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.22%
Pre-tax margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-18.62%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
9.66%
Similar net income growth to QCOM's 12.78%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
16.35%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 3.38%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
11.27%
Similar EPS growth to QCOM's 12.77%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
8.45%
Diluted EPS growth 50-75% of QCOM's 12.77%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-1.01%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.59%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.