205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.95%
Revenue growth below 50% of QCOM's 15.74%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
2.46%
Cost growth less than half of QCOM's 20.62%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
1.45%
Gross profit growth below 50% of QCOM's 13.26%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.49%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.47%
R&D growth less than half of QCOM's 10.28%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
550.00%
Other expenses change of 550.00% while QCOM maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
3.41%
Operating expenses growth less than half of QCOM's 19.58%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
2.78%
Total costs growth less than half of QCOM's 20.11%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.16%
D&A reduction while QCOM shows 115.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-0.70%
EBITDA decline while QCOM shows 59.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.59%
EBITDA margin decline while QCOM shows 38.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.33%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.23%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-60.00%
Other expenses reduction while QCOM shows 125.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-0.98%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.87%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.95%
Tax expense reduction while QCOM shows 65.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.90%
Net income growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.02%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.79%
EPS growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.82%
Diluted EPS growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.94%
Share count reduction while QCOM shows 1.91% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.17%
Diluted share reduction while QCOM shows 2.49% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.