PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.33%
Revenue decline while QCOM shows 13.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
8.71%
Cost growth 50-75% of QCOM's 17.14%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
-11.24%
Gross profit decline while QCOM shows 11.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-10.04%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
20.00%
R&D growth above 1.5x QCOM's 12.42%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
80.27%
Other expenses change of 80.27% while QCOM maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
27.20%
Operating expenses growth 1.25-1.5x QCOM's 21.51%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
15.20%
Similar total costs growth to QCOM's 19.28%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
40.00%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x QCOM's 3.45%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
46.90%
D&A growth above 1.5x QCOM's 30.27%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-31.34%
EBITDA decline while QCOM shows 67.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-30.42%
EBITDA margin decline while QCOM shows 36.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-55.16%
Operating income decline while QCOM shows 11.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-54.56%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
50.00%
Other expenses growth while QCOM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-55.38%
Pre-tax income decline while QCOM shows 3.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-54.78%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-72.07%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-50.42%
Net income decline while QCOM shows 2.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-49.75%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-50.00%
EPS decline while QCOM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-49.02%
Diluted EPS decline while QCOM shows 1.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.70%
Share count reduction while QCOM shows 0.54% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.35%
Diluted share reduction while QCOM shows 0.41% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.