205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-12.12%
Revenue decline while QCOM shows 5.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-7.03%
Cost reduction while QCOM shows 7.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-16.95%
Gross profit decline while QCOM shows 4.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-5.50%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.21%
R&D reduction while QCOM shows 14.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2925.00%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x QCOM's 1385.71%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
45.22%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x QCOM's 18.25%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
11.37%
Similar total costs growth to QCOM's 12.33%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-3.06%
D&A reduction while QCOM shows 16.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-58.44%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-52.70%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-83.45%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-81.17%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
433.33%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x QCOM's 46.23%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-81.61%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-79.08%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-284.75%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-66.33%
Net income decline while QCOM shows 5.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-61.68%
Net margin decline while QCOM shows 0.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-66.18%
EPS decline while QCOM shows 7.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-65.67%
Diluted EPS decline while QCOM shows 5.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.50%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-1.49%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.