205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.62%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 1.76%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
-2.25%
Cost reduction while QCOM shows 6.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
14.26%
Positive growth while QCOM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
8.19%
Margin expansion while QCOM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-7.16%
R&D reduction while QCOM shows 9.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-294.06%
Other expenses reduction while QCOM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-32.18%
Operating expenses reduction while QCOM shows 10.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-14.02%
Total costs reduction while QCOM shows 8.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
4.35%
Interest expense growth while QCOM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-12.17%
D&A reduction while QCOM shows 2.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
70.42%
EBITDA growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
61.36%
EBITDA margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
129.37%
Operating income growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
117.17%
Operating margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-14.29%
Other expenses reduction while QCOM shows 8.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
135.83%
Pre-tax income growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
123.29%
Pre-tax margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1750.00%
Tax expense growth while QCOM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
82.32%
Net income growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
72.63%
Net margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
84.37%
EPS growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
81.25%
Diluted EPS growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.36%
Share count reduction while QCOM shows 0.76% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.53%
Diluted share reduction while QCOM shows 0.69% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.