205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.47%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 1.94%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
-0.81%
Cost reduction while QCOM shows 5.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
13.31%
Positive growth while QCOM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
6.43%
Margin expansion while QCOM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-5.40%
R&D reduction while QCOM shows 6.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
152.04%
Other expenses change of 152.04% while QCOM maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
40.81%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x QCOM's 10.35%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
12.10%
Total costs growth above 1.5x QCOM's 7.51%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.95%
D&A growth above 1.5x QCOM's 2.82%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-5.05%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.82%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.84%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.50%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-16.67%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-7.48%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.10%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.77%
Tax expense reduction while QCOM shows 21.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.70%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.48%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.08%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.45%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.63%
Share count reduction while QCOM shows 0.29% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.54%
Diluted share reduction while QCOM shows 0.11% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.