205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.49%
Revenue decline while QCOM shows 2.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-0.86%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-2.01%
Gross profit decline while QCOM shows 3.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.53%
Margin decline while QCOM shows 1.74% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
5.78%
R&D growth while QCOM reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-50.68%
Other expenses reduction while QCOM shows 172.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-3.78%
Operating expenses reduction while QCOM shows 11.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.05%
Total costs reduction while QCOM shows 4.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
4.17%
Interest expense growth less than half of QCOM's 200.00%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-17.99%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-7.20%
EBITDA decline while QCOM shows 13.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.80%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.44%
Operating income growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.95%
Operating margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-280.00%
Other expenses reduction while QCOM shows 12.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-1.61%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.13%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
7.60%
Tax expense growth while QCOM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-4.70%
Net income decline while QCOM shows 24.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.26%
Net margin decline while QCOM shows 22.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.35%
EPS decline while QCOM shows 29.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.35%
Diluted EPS decline while QCOM shows 26.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.46%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.54%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.