PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.35%
Similar revenue growth to QCOM's 6.89%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
3.26%
Cost growth less than half of QCOM's 10.39%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
8.67%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 4.66%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2.18%
Margin expansion while QCOM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-4.87%
R&D reduction while QCOM shows 5.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.13%
Other expenses reduction while QCOM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-3.34%
Operating expenses reduction while QCOM shows 5.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.69%
Total costs growth less than half of QCOM's 8.09%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-4.17%
Interest expense reduction while QCOM shows 4533.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.33%
D&A growth less than half of QCOM's 1.04%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
15.02%
EBITDA growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.15%
EBITDA margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
19.65%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 4.27%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
12.51%
Operating margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.76%
Other expenses growth less than half of QCOM's 49.65%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
20.19%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 9.90%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
13.01%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 2.81%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
18.35%
Tax expense growth while QCOM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
20.94%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x QCOM's 14.24%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
13.72%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 6.87%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
22.22%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 14.66%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
22.58%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 14.91%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-1.03%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-1.10%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.