205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.64%
Revenue decline while QCOM shows 6.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-2.91%
Cost reduction while QCOM shows 10.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-4.17%
Gross profit decline while QCOM shows 2.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.55%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
8.68%
R&D growth while QCOM reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
47.27%
Other expenses growth less than half of QCOM's 102.94%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
7.92%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x QCOM's 2.32%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
1.06%
Total costs growth less than half of QCOM's 7.13%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.95%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-11.03%
EBITDA decline while QCOM shows 3.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.67%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.91%
Operating income decline while QCOM shows 3.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.62%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-38.46%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-13.52%
Pre-tax income decline while QCOM shows 2.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.26%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
8.40%
Tax expense growth while QCOM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-20.48%
Net income decline while QCOM shows 4.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.48%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-19.48%
EPS decline while QCOM shows 7.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-19.74%
Diluted EPS decline while QCOM shows 5.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.21%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.19%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.