205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.81%
Positive growth while QCOM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
7.26%
Cost increase while QCOM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
9.81%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 5.21%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.92%
Margin expansion below 50% of QCOM's 9.46%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.90%
R&D growth while QCOM reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.22%
Other expenses reduction while QCOM shows 99.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
3.67%
Operating expenses growth less than half of QCOM's 28.21%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
5.83%
Total costs growth above 1.5x QCOM's 1.12%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-4.55%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-6.02%
D&A reduction while QCOM shows 2.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
11.79%
EBITDA growth 1.25-1.5x QCOM's 8.12%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
2.74%
EBITDA margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
15.39%
Operating income growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.05%
Operating margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.67%
Other expenses growth less than half of QCOM's 120.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
16.00%
Pre-tax income growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.61%
Pre-tax margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
18.41%
Tax expense growth less than half of QCOM's 42.99%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
15.19%
Net income growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.86%
Net margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
15.71%
EPS growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.49%
Diluted EPS growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.32%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.20%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.