PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-8.89%
Revenue decline while QCOM shows 9.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-10.27%
Cost reduction while QCOM shows 6.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-8.13%
Gross profit decline while QCOM shows 12.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.83%
Margin expansion below 50% of QCOM's 2.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.93%
R&D growth above 1.5x QCOM's 0.43%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.23%
Other expenses growth less than half of QCOM's 8566.67%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
1.04%
Operating expenses growth less than half of QCOM's 38.34%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-6.06%
Total costs reduction while QCOM shows 21.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
10.53%
Interest expense growth less than half of QCOM's 23.31%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-0.44%
D&A reduction while QCOM shows 1.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-11.71%
EBITDA decline while QCOM shows 38.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.09%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.58%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.05%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1400.00%
Other expenses reduction while QCOM shows 18.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-13.36%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.90%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
139.29%
Tax expense growth less than half of QCOM's 3900.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-73.23%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-70.62%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-72.87%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-73.02%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.30%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.10%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.