PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.04%
Revenue growth below 50% of QCOM's 2.76%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
2.44%
Cost growth above 1.5x QCOM's 0.38%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
0.29%
Gross profit growth below 50% of QCOM's 4.70%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.75%
Margin decline while QCOM shows 1.89% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.26%
R&D reduction while QCOM shows 1.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.22%
Other expenses reduction while QCOM shows 51.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
2.51%
Operating expenses growth less than half of QCOM's 15.66%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
2.47%
Total costs growth less than half of QCOM's 8.38%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
9.52%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x QCOM's 3.66%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
2.23%
D&A growth while QCOM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.56%
EBITDA growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.48%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.96%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.98%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
138.46%
Other expenses growth while QCOM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.19%
Pre-tax income growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.84%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-84.49%
Tax expense reduction while QCOM shows 2127.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
297.09%
Net income growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
293.01%
Net margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
294.29%
EPS growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
297.06%
Diluted EPS growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.20%
Share count reduction while QCOM shows 0.07% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.20%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.