PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.02%
Positive growth while QCOM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.17%
Cost increase while QCOM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
7.03%
Positive growth while QCOM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.95%
Margin expansion below 50% of QCOM's 2.37%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.26%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.23%
Other expenses growth while QCOM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.89%
Operating expenses growth while QCOM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.86%
Total costs growth while QCOM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
30.43%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x QCOM's 5.29%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
1.75%
D&A growth less than half of QCOM's 6.89%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
9.09%
EBITDA growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.89%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of QCOM's 92.39%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.59%
Operating income growth below 50% of QCOM's 1420.69%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.32%
Operating margin growth below 50% of QCOM's 1653.95%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-220.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
9.85%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of QCOM's 1425.93%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.62%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of QCOM's 1629.31%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
60.96%
Tax expense growth while QCOM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.86%
Net income growth below 50% of QCOM's 106.10%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.98%
Net margin decline while QCOM shows 107.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
3.62%
EPS growth below 50% of QCOM's 105.46%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.70%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of QCOM's 105.46%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.61%
Share count reduction while QCOM shows 0.34% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.80%
Diluted share reduction while QCOM shows 1.15% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.