PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.07%
Similar revenue growth to QCOM's 6.42%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
4.22%
Cost growth less than half of QCOM's 11.26%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
7.06%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 2.85%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.93%
Margin expansion while QCOM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.56%
R&D growth above 1.5x QCOM's 1.00%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.22%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-4.41%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
0.82%
Total costs growth while QCOM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
20.00%
Similar interest expense growth to QCOM's 18.44%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
4.29%
D&A growth 50-75% of QCOM's 6.70%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset strategy.
11.88%
Similar EBITDA growth to QCOM's 11.44%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
5.48%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of QCOM's 69.22%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
13.14%
Operating income growth below 50% of QCOM's 109.75%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.66%
Operating margin growth below 50% of QCOM's 97.09%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-116.67%
Other expenses reduction while QCOM shows 163.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
12.78%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of QCOM's 167.04%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.32%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of QCOM's 150.92%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
17.61%
Tax expense growth while QCOM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.74%
Net income growth below 50% of QCOM's 235.81%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.34%
Net margin growth below 50% of QCOM's 215.54%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
12.59%
EPS growth below 50% of QCOM's 268.18%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
12.86%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of QCOM's 268.18%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.82%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.80%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.