PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-12.77%
Revenue decline while QCOM shows 3.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-10.09%
Cost reduction while QCOM shows 14.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-14.16%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.60%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.56%
R&D growth while QCOM reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.94%
Other expenses reduction while QCOM shows 1266.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
2.77%
Operating expenses growth less than half of QCOM's 65.23%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-5.29%
Total costs reduction while QCOM shows 38.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.47%
D&A growth while QCOM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-18.84%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.96%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-21.73%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.28%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.88%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.45%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-25.42%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-21.08%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.53%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-19.88%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-19.62%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.65%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-1.92%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.