205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.06%
Revenue growth 50-75% of QCOM's 2.89%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
-1.88%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
4.38%
Similar gross profit growth to QCOM's 5.61%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
2.27%
Similar margin change to QCOM's 2.65%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry pricing power.
0.26%
R&D growth less than half of QCOM's 3.07%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.30%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-3.17%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-2.39%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
15.79%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x QCOM's 3.85%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
3.49%
D&A growth while QCOM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.09%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 4.54%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
6.88%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of QCOM's 15.74%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.21%
Operating income growth below 50% of QCOM's 32.39%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.01%
Operating margin growth below 50% of QCOM's 28.67%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
500.00%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x QCOM's 11.26%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
9.95%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of QCOM's 44.19%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.73%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of QCOM's 40.13%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
30.63%
Tax expense growth less than half of QCOM's 128.09%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
7.23%
Net income growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.07%
Net margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.98%
EPS growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.94%
Diluted EPS growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.21%
Share count reduction while QCOM shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.31%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.