205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-11.16%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-5.43%
Cost reduction while QCOM shows 0.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-14.27%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.49%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.85%
R&D growth less than half of QCOM's 4.42%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-36.71%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-1.05%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-3.71%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
4.65%
Interest expense growth while QCOM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-9.09%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-18.23%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.95%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-21.40%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.52%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
188.89%
Other expenses growth while QCOM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-20.44%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.44%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
20.65%
Tax expense growth while QCOM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-24.91%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.48%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-25.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-24.83%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.21%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.21%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.