205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.70%
Revenue decline while QCOM shows 2.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-6.77%
Cost reduction while QCOM shows 8.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-0.29%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.48%
Margin expansion while QCOM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.53%
R&D growth less than half of QCOM's 4.41%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
48.00%
Other expenses change of 48.00% while QCOM maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
1.18%
Operating expenses growth while QCOM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-3.55%
Total costs reduction while QCOM shows 4.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
6.67%
Interest expense growth while QCOM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.40%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
3.75%
EBITDA growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.64%
EBITDA margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.29%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.46%
Operating margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
355.00%
Other expenses growth while QCOM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.49%
Pre-tax income growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.40%
Pre-tax margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-302.00%
Tax expense reduction while QCOM shows 490.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
17.55%
Net income growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
20.81%
Net margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
19.84%
EPS growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
19.35%
Diluted EPS growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.61%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-1.70%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.