PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.23%
Positive growth while QCOM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.34%
Cost growth less than half of QCOM's 26.14%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
5.71%
Positive growth while QCOM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.46%
Margin expansion while QCOM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.52%
R&D reduction while QCOM shows 4.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.00%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of QCOM's 4.32%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
3.84%
Total costs growth less than half of QCOM's 16.65%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-4.17%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-0.82%
D&A reduction while QCOM shows 7.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
0.36%
EBITDA growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4.62%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.95%
Operating income growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.64%
Operating margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while QCOM shows 153.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.62%
Pre-tax income growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4.37%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-22.18%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
3.85%
Net income growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.31%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.83%
EPS growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.89%
Diluted EPS growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.33%
Share count reduction below 50% of QCOM's 0.35%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.32%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 0.70%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.