205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.56%
Positive growth while QCOM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.33%
Cost growth 50-75% of QCOM's 3.61%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
-0.22%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.77%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.11%
R&D growth above 1.5x QCOM's 0.88%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.67%
Other expenses growth while QCOM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.10%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x QCOM's 1.84%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
2.97%
Similar total costs growth to QCOM's 2.97%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
8.16%
Interest expense growth while QCOM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.17%
D&A growth above 1.5x QCOM's 2.34%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
0.10%
EBITDA growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.45%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.65%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.20%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
52.38%
Other expenses growth 1.1-1.25x QCOM's 46.44%. Bill Ackman would demand expense justification.
-0.86%
Pre-tax income decline while QCOM shows 23.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.41%
Pre-tax margin decline while QCOM shows 26.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.92%
Tax expense reduction while QCOM shows 4.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.17%
Net income growth below 50% of QCOM's 27.13%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.38%
Net margin decline while QCOM shows 29.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.21%
EPS growth below 50% of QCOM's 27.20%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.82%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of QCOM's 28.02%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.76%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.75%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.