205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-10.89%
Revenue decline while QCOM shows 4.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-2.52%
Cost reduction while QCOM shows 1.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-14.65%
Gross profit decline while QCOM shows 6.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-4.22%
Margin decline while QCOM shows 2.35% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.70%
R&D growth less than half of QCOM's 6.14%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.66%
Other expenses reduction while QCOM shows 61.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-2.98%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-2.69%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
13.21%
Interest expense growth less than half of QCOM's 107.14%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
0.38%
D&A growth less than half of QCOM's 11.87%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-16.25%
EBITDA decline while QCOM shows 7.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.01%
EBITDA margin decline while QCOM shows 29.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.75%
Operating income decline while QCOM shows 7.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.81%
Operating margin decline while QCOM shows 3.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
55.00%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x QCOM's 15.88%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-18.47%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.50%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-43.53%
Tax expense reduction while QCOM shows 7.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-14.51%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.06%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.94%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.77%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.77%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.76%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.