PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
3.47%
Positive growth while QCOM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
6.93%
Cost growth above 1.5x QCOM's 2.70%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
1.64%
Positive growth while QCOM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-1.77%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.84%
R&D growth while QCOM reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.97%
Operating expenses growth less than half of QCOM's 2.64%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
4.66%
Total costs growth above 1.5x QCOM's 2.67%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
30.88%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x QCOM's 5.29%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
6.76%
D&A growth less than half of QCOM's 18.09%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
4.18%
EBITDA growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.69%
EBITDA margin growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.96%
Operating income growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.46%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
150.00%
Other expenses growth while QCOM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.88%
Pre-tax income growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.57%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
17.65%
Tax expense growth less than half of QCOM's 96.94%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
0.82%
Net income growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.56%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.53%
EPS growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.08%
Diluted EPS growth while QCOM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.11%
Share count increase while QCOM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.