205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-10.20%
Revenue decline while QCOM shows 15.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-4.86%
Cost reduction while QCOM shows 11.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-13.82%
Gross profit decline while QCOM shows 18.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-4.03%
Margin decline while QCOM shows 2.82% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
3.91%
R&D growth while QCOM reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.91%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-6.64%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
18.37%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x QCOM's 2.30%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
7.42%
D&A growth while QCOM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-10.69%
EBITDA decline while QCOM shows 36.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.54%
EBITDA margin decline while QCOM shows 66.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.11%
Operating income decline while QCOM shows 107.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.58%
Operating margin decline while QCOM shows 80.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-53.33%
Other expenses reduction while QCOM shows 240.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-16.47%
Pre-tax income decline while QCOM shows 108.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.98%
Pre-tax margin decline while QCOM shows 81.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
6.21%
Tax expense growth less than half of QCOM's 172.25%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-19.40%
Net income decline while QCOM shows 85.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.24%
Net margin decline while QCOM shows 61.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-19.33%
EPS decline while QCOM shows 86.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-19.46%
Diluted EPS decline while QCOM shows 86.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.22%
Share count change of 0.22% while QCOM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.22%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of QCOM's 0.18%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.